|
3.202. Expert Testimony of Mental Mitigation During Penalty Phase of Capital Trial: Notice and Examination by State Expert
(a) Notice of Intent to Seek Death Penalty. The
provisions of this rule apply only in those capital cases
in which the state gives written notice of its intent to
seek the death penalty within 45 days from the date
of arraignment. Failure to give timely written notice
under this subdivision does not preclude the state from
seeking the death penalty.
(b) Notice of Intent to Present Expert Testimony
of Mental Mitigation. When in any capital case, in
which the state has given notice of intent to seek the
death penalty under subdivision (a) of this rule, it shall
be the intention of the defendant to present, during the
penalty phase of the trial, expert testimony of a mental
health professional, who has tested, evaluated, or
examined the defendant, in order to establish statutory
or nonstatutory mental mitigating
circumstances, the
defendant shall give written notice of intent to present
such testimony.
(c) Time for Filing Notice; Contents. The defendant
shall give notice of intent to present expert testimony
of mental mitigation not less than 20 days
before trial. The notice shall contain a statement of
particulars listing the statutory and nonstatutory mental
mitigating circumstances the defendant expects to
establish through expert testimony
and the names and
addresses of the mental health experts by whom the
defendant expects to establish mental mitigation, insofar
as is possible.
(d) Appointment of State Expert; Time of
Examination.
After the filing of such notice and on
the motion of the state indicating its desire to seek
the death penalty, the court shall order that, within
48 hours after the defendant is convicted of capital
murder, the defendant be examined by a mental health
expert chosen by the state. Attorneys for the state and
defendant may be present at the examination.
The
examination shall be limited to those mitigating circumstances
the defendant expects to establish through
expert testimony.
(e) Defendant’s Refusal to Cooperate. If the defendant
refuses to be examined by or fully cooperate
with
the state’s mental health expert, the court may, in its
discretion:
(1) order the defense to allow the state’s expert to
review all mental health reports, tests, and evaluations
by the defendant’s mental health expert; or
(2) prohibit defense mental health experts from
testifying concerning mental health tests, evaluations,
or examinations of the defendant.
|